A vendor that only supplies capacity
Your team still owns scope, architecture, QA and release risk. Lower rates do not fix the accountability gap.
Poland to UK · accountable product delivery
Nearshore software development for UK product teams
A senior product team in your working day — without building another layer of supplier management.
GMI Software designs and delivers mobile, commerce and AI-enabled products from Gdansk. UK teams get English delivery, daily overlap, one accountable technical lead and a clear route from discovery to production and maintenance.
UK and Poland share the core working day.
A practical first conversation
Bring the goal, constraints and systems — not a finished specification.
- The business outcome and the person who owns it
- Users, current workflow and the costly friction
- Systems, data and integrations the product depends on
- Deadline, commercial range and non-negotiable constraints
120+ projectsdeliveredProduct work across mobile, commerce, platforms and integrations.
30-person teamunder one delivery modelProduct design, engineering, QA and release ownership.
100+ integrationsacross business systemsERP, PIM, WMS, payments, APIs and legacy systems.
Nearshore only works when it removes management load
A proposal built before the risk is known
Integrations, data quality and release constraints surface late, turning an attractive quote into change requests.
A distributed team with no decision rhythm
Timezone overlap is wasted when nobody owns decisions, written context and a demonstrable outcome each sprint.
What changes
One product team, a shared working day and explicit ownership
We start by reducing uncertainty, not by adding developers to a channel. Discovery maps the business goal, system landscape, constraints and release path. The resulting scope becomes a phased delivery plan with visible decisions, QA and code ownership.
Mobile products
React Native and Expo apps, backend APIs, store release and post-launch improvement.
ExploreCommerce platforms
Headless and B2B commerce with operational workflows and ERP/PIM/WMS integrations.
ExploreAI-enabled software
Practical AI features and automation inside products and business workflows.
ExploreExisting product recovery
Architecture, UX and delivery audits followed by a bounded repair or modernisation plan.
ExploreFrom uncertainty to production
A delivery path with an outcome at every gate
Fit and evidence
We review the goal, users, systems, deadline and decision owner. If the fit is weak, we say so before a paid engagement.
Discovery and risk map
Product, design and engineering turn assumptions into flows, architecture, dependencies and acceptance criteria.
Phased commercial plan
You receive a delivery recommendation, scope boundaries and a commercial model matched to what is actually known.
Build, demo and handover
A working increment, QA evidence and decisions are reviewed continuously. Code and documentation remain transferable.
A strong fit for a UK team that wants product ownership, not body leasing
Strong fit
- A revenue or operations-critical digital product
- A mobile, commerce, platform or AI-enabled scope
- A UK product owner who can make business decisions
- Remote delivery with planned workshops and reviews
Consider a different model when
- Permanent daily on-site staffing is mandatory
- Procurement requires a UK legal entity or UK-only personnel
- The work is a fully specified ticket queue with no product or technical uncertainty
Questions UK teams ask before the first scope
How much working-day overlap is there with the UK?
Poland is one hour ahead of the UK for most of the year, so the core business day overlaps. We agree a decision and meeting rhythm at kickoff instead of relying on ad-hoc calls.
Do you provide staff augmentation?
We can extend an established product team, but our strongest model is accountable product delivery: discovery, technical plan, engineering, QA, release and maintenance in one scope.
Can we start with a fixed price?
A fixed price is appropriate after enough discovery to define scope and risk. Before that point we provide a bounded discovery or audit rather than hiding uncertainty inside a quote.
Who owns the source code?
The commercial agreement defines handover, but our standard delivery model avoids product lock-in: repositories, architecture context and working documentation are part of the engagement.
Continue your evaluation