Catalogue and pricing live in several systems
The customer sees one shop, while teams reconcile stock, contract prices and orders by hand.
Headless and B2B commerce · UK delivery
Modernise the customer experience without pretending the storefront is the whole commerce system.
GMI Software builds headless and B2B commerce around the operational reality: catalogue, pricing, stock, orders, customer roles, approvals and ERP/PIM/WMS integrations. UK teams get a same-day delivery rhythm and ownership from discovery through launch.
UK and Poland share the core working day.
A practical first conversation
The customer sees one shop, while teams reconcile stock, contract prices and orders by hand.
Roles, approvals, quote flows and account-specific terms become brittle plugins and exceptions.
Data quality, redirects, payments, ERP events and rollback are left until the launch window.
What changes
We map commercial rules, system ownership, data movement and failure handling before committing to architecture. MedusaJS, Next.js or a dedicated service is selected because it fits the operating model — not because headless is fashionable.
Contract pricing, roles, approvals, repeat ordering, quotes and account-specific catalogues.
ExploreImplementation, migration and custom modules with owned source code and open architecture.
ExploreExplicit system ownership, event handling, retries, reconciliation and operational observability.
ExploreData migration, SEO continuity, analytics and a staged release rather than a single irreversible cutover.
From uncertainty to production
We document customer types, channels, pricing, catalogue, fulfilment and the systems that own each fact.
APIs, data quality, event flows, security, redirects, analytics and rollback become explicit delivery dependencies.
We deliver complete customer journeys across storefront, commerce core and integrations rather than isolated layers.
Reconciliation, performance, analytics and operational ownership are verified before traffic and channels scale.
No. MedusaJS is a strong option for owned, extensible commerce, but architecture follows the operating model. We also work with existing platforms and dedicated services when that is the lower-risk choice.
Yes. We first establish which system owns each business fact and how failures are detected and recovered. The integration is then scoped as a product capability, not a hidden technical task.
With source-data profiling, mapping, rehearsals, reconciliation, redirect and analytics plans, a launch checklist and a rollback path proportionate to the business risk.
No. If a standard platform supports the business model without excessive exceptions, it can be the better commercial decision. Discovery should prove the need for headless.
Continue your evaluation