Before launch
You have a prototype, TestFlight, or internal build and need to separate blockers from later improvements.
Code and production-readiness audit
We review the code and release path of a working React Native or Expo app built with AI assistance, by a freelancer, an internal team, or a previous supplier. You receive a clear split between release blockers, important fixes, and work that can wait.
Scope my app auditWe first confirm the product stage, available access, and release decision. The qualification call is not a technical audit.
The right moment
This audit is for an operating company with an existing app or codebase and a concrete decision to make.
You have a prototype, TestFlight, or internal build and need to separate blockers from later improvements.
A freelancer or vendor is handing back the code and another team must take responsibility.
You need technical evidence for a decision, a repair scope, and an ordered plan.
Risk before production
AI and rapid development tools can produce a working app earlier. Before production, the whole system still needs review: code, data, failure paths, release configuration, monitoring, and ownership of accounts and infrastructure.
The happy path works, but API failure, lost connectivity, or an expired session remains unclear.
A build works on one machine, while signing and publishing are not reproducible.
Nobody has separated real release blockers from improvements that can wait.
The repository, store accounts, secrets, and monitoring do not have a clear owner.
Review scope
The default scope covers React Native and Expo. Backend systems and other stacks require a separately confirmed scope.
Module boundaries, dependencies, duplicated logic, maintainability, and upgrade path.
Sessions, permissions, secrets, validation, timeouts, retries, offline behaviour, and visible configuration risks.
Critical-flow coverage, crashes, device behaviour, network conditions, and failure scenarios.
CI/CD, signing, store accounts, configuration, monitoring, documentation, and responsibility.
Decision pack
Every material finding is connected to evidence, business impact, and a recommended next step.
How it works
We confirm the product, technology, stage, available access, and the decision the audit must support.
We agree the scope, commit, builds, environments, and access to evidence.
We reproduce the agreed build and review critical flows and technical areas.
Each finding receives evidence, impact, priority, recommendation, and a recheck condition.
We deliver the readiness status, risk register, action plan, and discuss it with the team.
The standard audit is not a penetration test, security certification, formal WCAG/EN 301 549 conformance audit, legal opinion, or guarantee of App Store or Google Play acceptance. Remediation, retesting, and implementation are separate scopes.
Looking to improve activation, conversion, or retention? See our mobile growth audit
Paid technical audit
This form is for an operating company with an existing app or codebase. We first confirm scope and available access.
Yes. We do not judge code by its origin. We assess system behaviour, maintainability, the release path, and evidence within the agreed scope.
Yes. They are the default V1 scope. Another stack requires separate confirmation of capability and scope.
No. We can perform a bounded review of the security-risk surface, but it is not a pentest, certification, or legal opinion.
The audit ends with an action plan. Remediation or retesting can be delivered by the current team, another partner, or GMI under a separate scope.
We agree the scope before starting. Code, a reproducible build, and environment information are usually required. Backend, store, and monitoring access depends on the audit goal.
We can review agreed parts of the release path, but we cannot guarantee platform approval or a defect-free production release.
Show us the product stage and release decision. We will tell you whether a production-readiness audit is the right next step.