gmi.software
01 · Your app

Mobile apps

When the app is slow to change, crashes or nobody owns it.

  • Develop or take over an app
  • Loyalty apps
  • Mobile app code audit
  • App maintenance and releases

SFD: 100,000+ downloads, 4.9 App Store rating

02 · Your shop

Online shops

When the platform takes a cut of every sale or blocks what you need.

  • Online shop development
  • Shop app analytics
  • Plan and prototype before you build

120+ projects delivered

03 · Systems behind them

Integrations

When orders, stock and points are copied by hand.

  • ERP, warehouse and payments
  • AI for one manual process
  • Workshops and estimate

100+ integrations

Before a call
  • App cost estimateScope and a budget range
  • Shop platform adviserDecisions, risks and options
  • Shop cost over 5 yearsOff-the-shelf or custom, compared

After workshops: an agreed scope and a fixed price for delivering it

All services →
SFDLoyalty and shopping app100,000+ downloads · 4.9 App Store ratingMój Świat KsiążkiLoyalty programme for a bookstore chain100,000+ downloadsEMKAMedical waste tracking app5000+ downloads in first month
All 120+ projects →App ideas library
TeamAbout usWho we are and how we workCareersHow we work and open roles
Contact and stackContact[email protected]TechnologiesReact Native, MedusaJS, Node.js and the rest
Reviews5.0 on Google4.9 on ClutchClutch ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Blog
ENBook a free consultation
What we do+−

01 · Your app

Mobile apps

  • Develop or take over an app
  • Loyalty apps
  • Mobile app code audit
  • App maintenance and releases

02 · Your shop

Online shops

  • Online shop development
  • Shop app analytics
  • Plan and prototype before you build

03 · Systems behind them

Integrations

  • ERP, warehouse and payments
  • AI for one manual process
  • Workshops and estimate

Before a call

  • App cost estimateScope and a budget range
  • Shop platform adviserDecisions, risks and options
  • Shop cost over 5 yearsOff-the-shelf or custom, compared
All services →
Projects+−
  • SFD100,000+ downloads · 4.9 App Store rating
  • Mój Świat Książki100,000+ downloads
  • EMKA5000+ downloads in first month
  • All 120+ projects →
  • App ideas library
Company+−
  • About usWho we are and how we work
  • CareersHow we work and open roles
  • Contact[email protected]
  • TechnologiesReact Native, MedusaJS, Node.js and the rest
Blog→
Book a free consultation

5.0 on Google · 4.9 on Clutch

Back to blog
E-commerce
Updated: October 12, 2026· Originally published: July 2, 2026
4 min read

Medusa or Shopify Plus: how to compare cost and risk

Compare implementation, platform fees, integrations, operations and change costs. Assess three options: stay, extend or replatform.

Mikołaj Lehman, CEO & Founder, GMI Software
Mikołaj Lehman
CEO & Founder, GMI Software

In brief

No platform is cheaper for every business. Compare the same requirements, time period and responsibilities. Before migrating, check whether a smaller change can solve the problem.

No platform is cheaper for every business. Compare the same requirements, time period and responsibilities. Before migrating, check whether a smaller change can solve the problem.

Start with requirements, not a winner

For each option, check required workflows, available extensions, integration costs and responsibility for failures. B2B complexity alone does not determine the choice.

Then assess Shopify Plus, Medusa or another solution against the same requirements. Test catalogues, pricing rules, orders, approvals and integrations using examples from your own business.

Compare the same costs and responsibilities

Separate one-off costs from operations and changes. Include platform fees, extensions, storefront work, integrations, post-launch operations and business changes. Record the source and allocation of responsibilities for each line.

Use the same period, scope, currency and tax assumptions for each option. Include migration costs, exception handling and transition dependencies. Mark missing values as unknown rather than zero.

The GMI TCO calculator helps compare your own scenarios and assumptions. It does not prove that one platform wins.

Compare the options before selecting technology

Staying, extending and replatforming are three valid options. Check the criteria for each before deciding.

  • Stay on the current platform. Consider when: critical workflows work and the issues can be addressed within the existing setup. May rule it out: a confirmed constraint blocks a critical workflow or product plan. Evidence needed: run costs, specific constraints and feasible improvements.
  • Extend the platform and integrations. Consider when: the problem concerns selected workflows rather than the entire system. May rule it out: another workaround increases risk or leaves the root cause unresolved. Evidence needed: system map, data ownership, change costs and failure handling.
  • Replatform. Consider when: constraints are documented and remediation alternatives have been compared. May rule it out: no maintenance owner, migration plan or business rationale. Evidence needed: requirements, a comparable cost model and a data/cutover plan.

Integrations and changes: check the cost of exceptions

Record which system is the source of truth for products, prices, stock and orders. Check delays, retries, data errors and manual corrections using real examples.

Compare who handles failures and rule changes in each option. Do not assume that extending is always cheaper or safer than replatforming.

The cost of an operations team or partner belongs in the comparison. Define responsibilities for updates, technical security and releases; code rights require checking the agreement and licences.

Migration needs its own plan

Phasing is not automatically safer. Before changing platforms, define the data, dependency and cutover plan and the criteria for checking critical workflows.

  1. Record documented constraints and compare feasible remedies.
  2. Identify the owners of implementation, data and operations.
  3. Agree cutover criteria and a response plan for failures.

Staying is also a valid outcome

Choose a platform using requirements, comparable costs and operational responsibilities. Staying or making a smaller change are valid outcomes.

Do not select Medusa solely to remove a subscription. First identify who will own implementation, operations and changes. If the current system supports your workflows and there is no justified need to rebuild, staying is a valid outcome.

Discuss your platform and integration decision

Describe the workflow constraining your business, the systems involved and the decision you need to make. This starts qualification; it does not promise savings, pricing or a migration date.

Discuss your platform and integration decision

Sources for checking assumptions

Check the current terms and scope for the selected plan, market and agreement. These links do not automatically validate your cost-model assumptions.

Medusa documentation: https://docs.medusajs.com/learn/fundamentals/modules

Medusa Cloud plan information: https://medusajs.com/pricing

Shopify Plus plan information: https://www.shopify.com/plus/pricing

Frequently asked questions

Does Medusa always have a lower total cost than Shopify Plus?
No. The result depends on scope, integrations, operations, changes and cost assumptions. Compare the same period and a comparable allocation of responsibilities. Removing one fee does not prove a lower total system cost.
Must we migrate the entire platform at once?
Do not assume that before assessing dependencies. Compare staying, changing selected integrations and migrating. Phasing needs a separate data, dependency and cutover plan; it is not automatically safer.
What information should we prepare?
Describe critical workflows, systems, current costs and constraints. Separate one-off costs from operations and changes. Record a source, period and assumption for each line; mark missing values as unknown.
When should we not choose Medusa?
When a business problem does not justify the change or there is no plan for implementation and operational ownership. Check staying or making a smaller change first. Technology preference alone is insufficient.

Related reading

  • MedusaJS development

    Implementations, migrations and Medusa v2 teams for international clients.

  • Headless e-commerce

    B2B, ERP, omnichannel and Next.js storefront.

  • MedusaJS 2.0

    Technology expertise and platform comparison.

  • Medusa vs Shopify Plus: TCO

    A comparison of cost, source-code control and the platform operating model.

  • B2B e-commerce guide

    Company accounts, price lists, approvals and integrations in one decision model.

Content updated: October 12, 2026

Mikołaj Lehman, CEO & Founder, GMI Software
Mikołaj Lehman
CEO & Founder, GMI Software

Mikołaj Lehman is the CEO and founder of GMI Software. On the blog, he covers decisions around mobile apps, ecommerce and digital product delivery.

  • Mobile apps and React Native
  • Headless and B2B ecommerce
  • MedusaJS
  • Digital product delivery

Google Preferred Sources

See GMI more often in Google

Add gmi.software as a preferred source. Google may highlight our new articles more often in Top Stories and supported AI experiences.

Share article:

Related articles

E-commerce

What is Medusa.js v2? Architecture: modules, workflows and APIs

Medusa.js v2 from the inside: the four request layers, commerce and infrastructure modules, module isolation, workflows with step rollback, events, the admin and deployment. It ends with when to choose Medusa over SaaS and how to plan an implementation.

→
E-commerce

Multi-vendor marketplace on MedusaJS: what you need to design

Vendor model, data and permission isolation, offer publishing, per-vendor orders and the limits of the Medusa v2 core. Ends with the criteria for building the module yourself or adopting a ready-made one.

→

Let’s discuss your project.

Tell us what you need. We’ll suggest the next step.

[email protected]
gmi.software Sp. z o.o.ul. Jana Heweliusza 11 / 819
80-890 Gdansk, Poland
Rated 5.0 out of 5 on Google5.017 client reviews on Google
TechnologiesReact NativeExpoNext.jsReactTypeScriptMedusaJS3D configuratorsNode.jsNestJSPostgreSQLDockerAWSPlaywrightMaestro
© 2026 gmi.software Sp. z o.o.
Privacy PolicyTerms